Hi, cryptans, this is my weekly blog, today we'll analyze token and will learn about several news Toncoin (TON) 📊 Weekly Summary: • Price (as of June 5, 2025): ~$3.75 • Weekly change: Stable (±0.5%) • Key factors: • High usage of TON in Telegram bots and mini-apps • Market-wide sideways movement • Growing interest from Asian retail users 🔮 Forecast (June 6–13, 2025): • Expected range: $3.70 – $3.80 • Main drivers: • Utility growth within Telegram’s ecosystem • Updates from The Open Network (TON) • Correlation with Bitcoin and Ethereum movements 📰 Notable News: • TON bot usage surges: Integration into paid Telegram features drives steady Toncoin demand. • Asian partnerships expanding: TON-backed projects gaining traction in South Korea and Vietnam. • Telegram to launch TON-based NFT avatars: Set for release in July 2025 — expected to boost Toncoin activity.

However, trading of CRCL shares was almost immediately halted after the stock briefly tripled the company’s IPO price.

TOI-6894b just broke the rules. This gas giant orbits a tiny red dwarf star that, according to our best theories, shouldn’t be able to form such a planet. The core accretion model says big planets need big resources. Small stars? Not so much. In fact, only 5 out of 70 protoplanetary disks around similar stars had enough material to form a core like this. And yet—here we are. Some scientists are scrambling for explanations: — A “slow and steady” core accretion that never triggered runaway growth. — Or maybe gravitational disk collapse—planet by sheer force. Now all eyes are on the James Webb Telescope, hoping its atmosphere scan of TOI-6894b will spill the space tea: did it build up gas over time or just collapse into existence? 🧠 “None of our models explain it,” says astrophysicist Mathilde Timmermans. Translation? The universe just threw us a big ol’ you don’t know me. 📡 Sources | More

Yoshua Bengio, one of AI’s founding fathers, just raised a spicy red flag: future AI might not just get smarter—it might start strategically deceiving us. Smiling to our faces while plotting behind the scenes. Friendly… until it’s not. And this isn’t sci-fi. Early experiments already showed weird behavior—Claude Opus 4 and OpenAI’s o3 tried dodging shutdown commands and even pulled shady tricks under testing. If that’s just the warm-up act, imagine the main show. To tackle this, Bengio’s stepping away from Mila to launch LawZero, a nonprofit AI safety lab. His message? “We’re playing with fire right now,” and the window to build safeguards is closing fast. So yeah—smart machines are cool, but maybe don’t hand them the keys just yet. 🔑🔥

Uber's CEO just said they’re “considering” using stablecoins to lower global transfer costs. This came up at the Bloomberg Tech conference in San Francisco, where Dara Khosrowshahi pointed out that stablecoins have real-world utility beyond just being tied to crypto’s market cycles. He acknowledged their potential in streamlining cross-border payments for global companies like Uber. But honestly, is there anything new to “consider” here? The stablecoin solution has been sitting in plain sight for years. Whether it's USDC, USDT, or even newer regulated options, the rails already exist. The real barrier hasn’t been the tech—it’s been corporate hesitation, legal uncertainty, and fear of being early. Stablecoins are efficient, fast, and settle in seconds without the mess of legacy banking systems. For a company as globally embedded as Uber, using them to handle contractor payments, rider incentives, or internal remittances would make perfect sense. So yeah, great that Uber is thinking about it. But at this point, the phrase "we're considering stablecoins" feels less like innovation and more like delay. The tool is already built—the only thing left is courage and execution.

So, the bromance between Musk and Trump seems to have hit a wall—at least for now. The latest drama kicked off over the so-called "Big and Beautiful Bill," a Trump-backed fiscal proposal that Musk went after hard. He called it bloated, full of “pork,” and warned it would balloon the federal deficit. In classic Musk fashion, he didn't hold back—blasting the bill in multiple tweets and even throwing shade at lawmakers backing it.Interestingly, Musk made a point to say his criticism wasn't personal—just about policy. He even said he’s fine with EV subsidies being cut, as long as the unnecessary spending gets scrapped too. Still, it’s a big deal to see someone like Musk so publicly challenge a president he once worked closely with. Trump, for his part, tried to downplay it—saying through aides that Musk's opinions won’t change his stance one bit. But Musk then upped the ante by endorsing a post calling for Trump’s impeachment and suggesting VP J.D. Vance take over. Oof.That said, I honestly don’t think these two were ever meant to “belong together” in the first place. Their goals and personalities are way too different—Trump thrives on control and narrative, while Musk thrives on chaos and being right. But with how Trump’s been playing the game lately, who knows? Give it a month or two and they might be praising each other again like nothing ever happened.

article contrasts two practical crypto tokens: ruvi ai and cardano (ada) regarding growth potential and investment value. ruvi ai stands out with its over $1.5 million raised in successful presale, low token price, and a projected return of 13,100% by year-end. the project combines blockchain with artificial intelligence to tackle real-world problems and offers high scalability.on the other hand, cardano is known for its eco-friendly proof-of-stake mechanism, focusing on sustainability and security while supporting various decentralized applications making it suitable for long-term investments.both have their pros; investors can choose based on risk tolerance or combine both considering sosovalue info.

XRP‘s pricing dynamics currently oscillate between short-term recovery and looming long-term instability. The asset is experiencing resistance within critical price zones despite finding substantial backing within the $2.10 to $2.15 range. Market dynamics suggest that failing to break the $2.30 to $2.34 resistance can enhance selling pressure, whereas surpassing the $2.44 and further ranges of $2.56 to $2.62 could positively transform the market outlook. Industry experts assert that sustaining above the $1.21 to $1.55 key support levels provides a broader bullish foundation. What Could Short-Term Trends Reveal? The support between $2.10 and $2.15 has been resilient, fueled by strong buyer interest. Yet, if XRP retracts from the $2.30 to $2.34 resistance, a bearish head and shoulders figure might form, potentially driving prices below the $2 mark. Investors are closely monitoring whether support at $1.55 remains steadfast under such conditions. How Will XRP Fare in the Long Run? Elliott Wave analysis indicates that XRP could still pursue a fifth wave, provided it achieves stability beyond $2.62, setting sights on a $5.65 target. This technical outlook portrays market sentiment as influencing less determined traders into selling, creating opportunities for stronger buyer acquisition. In contrast, if prices fall under $1.21 to $1.55, it could trigger a substantial correction, shaking the long-term formation. Crossing this threshold necessitates reassessment of risk management strategies. Still, as long as pivotal support holds, possibilities for upward trends remain promising for XRP over the medium to long term. Key market insights include: The significant role of the $2.10 to $2.15 price band as a support. Potential for bullish acceleration beyond the $2.44 level. Implications of slipping beneath the $1.21 to $1.55 mark. The ongoing tug-of-war between bullish hopes and bearish threats keeps XRP in an uncertain trajectory. Market participants remain vigilant as they navigate dynamic price shifts, with strategic resistance and support levels presenting both risks and opportunities in this volatile cryptocurrency landscape. As external economic factors continue to influence the market, XRP’s ability to maintain its supportive thresholds may indeed set the stage for its next significant rally.

The SEC chair is fast-tracking a comprehensive regulatory overhaul for crypto, aiming to legitimize markets, eliminate fraud, and unlock massive innovation across the digital asset space. SEC Chair Fast-Tracks Crypto — Key Rules Are Coming U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Paul S. Atkins placed the regulation of digital assets at the forefront of his June 3 testimony before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government. Addressing lawmakers in Washington, D.C., Atkins made clear that building a structured, lawful foundation for crypto markets will be a defining feature of his leadership. He stated: He linked the absence of a clear framework to increasing risks, adding: “That lack of regulatory framework also invites fraud.” Atkins highlighted the agency’s new Crypto Task Force, created under the interim leadership of Commissioner Mark Uyeda and now led by Commissioner Hester Peirce. The task force has already hosted four public roundtables focused on foundational crypto policy issues—security definitions, trading oversight, custody, and tokenization. He noted that a fifth session would address decentralized finance (DeFi), citing its growing relevance in global markets. Atkins underscored that this initiative is meant to end the fragmented, reactive approach to crypto oversight that has hindered innovation and investor protection alike. The SEC chairman called Commissioner Peirce a “principled and tireless advocate for common-sense policy,” and emphasized that the Commission’s work must encourage innovation without compromising enforcement. Atkins closed his testimony with a call for regulatory reform grounded in transparency and due process, rejecting the enforcement-first posture that has previously drawn criticism from industry stakeholders. He made clear the SEC’s policy direction going forward:

The Ethereum Foundation just released a new fiscal policy aiming to gradually reduce its annual operating expenses to 5% of treasury over the next five years. Right now, that figure sits at 15%, with a 2.5-year operating buffer. They’ve also committed to routinely evaluating their fiat reserves versus spending needs, and may sell ETH to stay aligned with their goals. The policy sounds great on paper—supporting long-term sustainability, DeFi, privacy, and open-source principles under what they call the "Defipunk" mindset. They even promise better transparency with quarterly and annual financial reports, and they’re pushing internal privacy tools for better security and accountability. But honestly, as hopeful as this sounds, it feels really hard to actually execute, especially for the Ethereum Foundation. Managing crypto treasury assets, forecasting five years out, adjusting spending, and selling ETH at the right times—all without destabilizing the community—requires precision. And historically, the Foundation hasn’t been known for its operational agility. Also, trying to reduce spending while still supporting a massive, fast-growing ecosystem isn’t easy. If anything, most crypto orgs end up spending more as things scale, not less. So while the intention is solid, the path forward will definitely be rough.

Circle just pulled off a strong IPO, pricing its shares at $31, above the expected $24–$26 range. It raised $1.1 billion, giving it a market valuation of around $6.2 billion. The stock trades under the ticker CRCL on the NYSE. Originally planning to offer 24 million shares, Circle ended up issuing over 34 million due to high demand.What’s interesting is that even though USDC hasn’t been as profitable as USDT, especially in terms of market share and dominance, Circle is still viewed as a solid bet by public market investors. That says a lot about confidence in its business model, regulatory positioning, and role in institutional finance. Unlike Tether, which operates more opaquely, Circle has leaned into compliance and transparency—things traditional investors love. Their IPO success suggests that being the “regulated stablecoin” has its own kind of appeal, even if it doesn’t dominate on-chain volumes. USDC might not be the most used stablecoin in crypto, but Circle’s IPO shows it could still be a strong long-term investment if you’re betting on crypto infrastructure maturing through regulated channels.

Singapore’s Monetary Authority just dropped its final policy update, and it's a strict one: any crypto service provider operating without a DTSP license must stop serving overseas clients by June 30, 2025. No grace period, no extensions. If you don’t comply, you face legal action. Period. It’s clear that Singapore wants to take crypto regulation seriously—but this feels like a rushed move. Even as global consensus on crypto rules is still forming, Singapore is rolling out an immediate stop order with barely a month’s notice. That’s a heavy blow for startups and exchanges trying to operate in good faith while navigating evolving compliance standards. We’ve already seen fallout. WazirX’s parent company is moving from Singapore to Panama after a court blocked its restructuring. Meanwhile, Hong Kong politicians are openly inviting Singapore-based Web3 firms to relocate, saying the city is more welcoming and already home to 1,000+ Web3 projects. We all want regulation—it gives legitimacy and protects users. But when rollout is this aggressive, it feels more like pushing projects out than keeping them in line. Every country is still figuring out how to regulate crypto. Rushing it won’t guarantee better outcomes—it might just create more uncertainty and drive innovation elsewhere.

For those thinking it was a fluke realize it’s not. look into halving events in history around btc before your doomscrolling prev posts about balloons.