in a space where decentralization is everything, relying on a single point of failure never really made sense to me. the more we spread out control and responsibility, the stronger and more resilient the network becomes. that’s why the concept of providing some network that will help make things right comes to my mind. i was busy researching it , but i saw some other ones , like obol trying to use distributed validator technology (dvt). dvt basically means group of operators can work together run one validator . its a much smarter way safer way to support ethereums proof of stake system. with hundreds of operators already involved and over billion secured in staking with dvt seems like staking is seeing growing collaboration for smart validation whilst improving resilience. thats interesting!

49.7% of Crypto Projects Collapsing in 2025: What’s Going Wrong? 😱 The crypto market is facing a crisis in 2025, with 1.8 million cryptocurrency projects already wiped out by March 31st — a staggering number that marks the highest failure rate we’ve ever seen in a single year. This means nearly half of all crypto projects launched in 2025 have already failed, and it’s becoming one of the most significant trends in the market this year. --- Why Are Crypto Projects Failing at This Rate? Over the years, the crypto space has witnessed a massive influx of new projects, but what’s driving the collapse of so many this year? 1. Security and Technological Weakness: A large number of these projects failed because they lacked the security or technological foundation necessary to survive. Many started with lofty goals but couldn’t deliver, and as a result, they became obsolete and couldn’t generate the revenue needed to sustain them. 2. Market Resistance: After a few years of explosive growth, the crypto market is now struggling with bearish conditions. Prices of major cryptocurrencies have plunged, leading to diminished investor interest. This lack of investor confidence has caused many projects to falter and ultimately fail. --- 2024/2025: The Era of Cashing Out Despite some progress in LRT narratives and AI agents in 2024, the reality in 2025 is that the majority of activity in the space has been centered around cashing out rather than true technological advancements. This shift has left many wondering where the real innovations have gone. While the market saw short-term hype, it seems like the focus now is on quick profits from meme coins and cash-out tokens, rather than on building sustainable, innovative projects. The sad truth is, the space is stuck in a cash-out era with little progress on the actual blockchain technology front. --- What Happened to the Promised Innovation? Looking back to 2024, we saw the emergence of new ideas like LRT narratives and AI agents, but they didn’t lead to any breakthroughs that could transform the blockchain space. While these innovations were interesting, they didn’t fundamentally change the game or lead to large-scale, meaningful advancements in the ecosystem. --- The Crypto Space Needs a Wake-Up Call While meme coins and quick profits are grabbing the attention, the larger question remains: Where are the next true innovations? The market is currently in a boom and bust cycle, and without significant technological progress and long-term vision, the crypto space risks becoming a short-lived trend rather than a revolutionary shift in how we do business and finance.

In a bold move, publicly-traded logistics firm Freight Technologies (Fr8Tech) has announced a $20 million investment in Official Trump memecoins. This positions Fr8Tech as one of the first companies to integrate a memecoin into its digital asset strategy. CEO Javier Selgas suggests this initiative aims to enhance U.S.-Mexico commerce, though specific applications within supply chains remain unspecified.The investment coincides with scrutiny from the U.S. Office of Government Ethics, which is evaluating whether President Donald Trump's promotion of the coin to top investors raises federal ethics concerns. This development underscores the growing intersection between traditional industries and the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

Running on eth is like going to a restaurant in the suburbs and running on solana is different. i remember eating at this restaurant. the food was decent but servings were small and the wait was long so you have to order more. menu and serving sizes update all the time, add ons are frequently changing from salad dressing to drink choices.. i knew it went out of business last year because they couldn’t find an investor but now they are back! don’t know how but everyone seems happy. can’t tell if food has improved or just regulars from other places giving it another try. eth feels like ordering delivery from somewhere that don’t have their own menu or menu even pages up for you read over when arrived because each time attracted by pictures of new stuff looks cool with no care given for what’s coming out… kind overpriced too . you just make your choice blindly, they never serve exactly what you ordered and always get upset when ask them where’s my dessert.. they say “take-out” since ages ago. no one can tell by looking at the price tag which section it’s in, let alone deciding if should order again next week or not. you left with a feeling ate something good today while remembered sort things look better when looked up online first. both services highly rely on delivery guys though

Khi nào kết thúc mannet trả android

Bitcoin mining is more than just a financial activity; it's a potential cornerstone for the United States' energy strategy. With the nation's increasing energy demands and the push towards renewable sources, Bitcoin mining offers a unique solution to stabilize the grid and enhance energy efficiency.​ A recent opinion piece on Crypto.News emphasizes that if U.S. regulators prioritize Bitcoin mining, it could significantly contribute to the nation's energy infrastructure. The article highlights that Bitcoin miners can act as flexible loads, absorbing excess energy during periods of low demand and releasing it back to the grid when needed, thus balancing supply and demand effectively.​ Moreover, integrating Bitcoin mining with renewable energy sources can mitigate the intermittent nature of solar and wind power. By utilizing surplus energy that would otherwise go to waste, miners can support the growth of clean energy initiatives.​ However, the article also points out that regulatory clarity is crucial. Without clear policies, the potential benefits of Bitcoin mining may remain untapped. Therefore, it's imperative for policymakers to recognize and harness the synergies between cryptocurrency mining and energy production.​ In conclusion, Bitcoin mining isn't just about digital currency; it's about powering the future. With the right regulatory framework, it can become a vital component of the United States' energy strategy, ensuring a stable, efficient, and sustainable energy future.

Ethereum (ETH) is currently experiencing a significant downturn, with its price dropping to $1,822.71, marking a notable decline from previous highs. This bearish trend is further corroborated by the formation of a rare and concerning chart pattern known as the triple top.​ A triple top occurs when the price reaches a resistance level three times without breaking through, signaling a potential reversal from an uptrend to a downtrend. In Ethereum's case, this pattern has been observed on the weekly chart, with the neckline at $2,126. A decisive break below this level could lead to further declines, potentially targeting the $1,500 mark. ​ Additionally, Ethereum's market share is diminishing, with protocols on its network processing $56 billion in April, compared to Solana's $72 billion. This loss of dominance, coupled with the emergence of competing layer-2 solutions, contributes to the bearish sentiment surrounding ETH.​ Investors should exercise caution and monitor key support levels closely. A breach below the $1,757 level could signal further downside risk, potentially leading to a more severe market correction.

I did argue against it in this bear cycle but after hitting $0.144749 yesterday on kracken, the doge price is starting to fall back like a classic and expected pullback after a very strong bullish movement instead of holding support like i was originally hoping for. i was been secretly hoping for one more attempt at $0.15 before falling down but i guess we are not so lucky and precious time has been wasted. 🤷🏼‍♂️ that said..the last bull cycle all happened during the summer months. summer does officially start on june 21 with summer solstice sooo....there is still plenty of potential left to reach empty wallets if you guys get what i'm saying 🍻💸💎💎🚀🚀🕊️🐶🖤"doge to the moon!" 🖤🐶👨🏻‍⚖️❤️⁦‌|‍👩🏽⁠｜🇺🇸✝！！

1. Thành viên nổi bật hôm nay: @MrNoSleep — đã lập 5 topic trong 1 tiếng, hỏi xong tự trả lời luôn. Chúng tôi nghi ngờ bạn là AI do diễn đàn tự tạo để đẩy tương tác. 2. Quote vàng hôm nay: “Em hỏi Google rồi nhưng muốn hỏi lại cho chắc.” — Một cú đâm thẳng vào niềm tin của toàn bộ ngành công nghệ. 3. Câu hỏi khiến mod muốn nghỉ việc: “Em quên pass, có cách nào vào tài khoản người khác không ạ?” — Cảm ơn em, đã nhắc nhở đội ngũ bảo mật làm việc nghiêm túc hơn. 4. Bình luận đậm chất ‘phật tổ nhập’: “Bài viết này thiếu góc nhìn tâm linh.” — Khi bạn đang nói về cách đổi mật khẩu tài khoản email. 5. Drama nhẹ trong ngày: Topic: “Mac tốt hơn Windows vì nhìn sang.” — Gây war đến tận 3 giờ sáng, cuối cùng bị khóa vì lý do “mất đoàn kết nội bộ”.

On May 3 (UTC+8), Senator Cynthia Lummis revealed President Trump's support for the BITCOIN Act, proposing the purchase of 1 million BTC over five years as a national strategic reserve to mitigate the $36 trillion national debt risk, according to Bitcoin Magazine.

Over the past six months, BTC and ETH have started acting like two distinct assets. BTC has remained robust and consistent. Meanwhile, ETH has started to behave more like a memecoin and has lost momentum on many fronts. ETH’s statistical trading behavior, value proposition, and community culture have made it difficult for institutions to continue to engage. The risk-reward is hard to justify and the momentum of statistics like new developers and users is moving in the wrong direction as compared to competitors. The data suggests ETH has fundamentally changed. It has de-correlated from BTC and added much greater tail risk. It trades now like a memecoin rather than a predictable asset. Even during the turbulence of Q1 2025, bitcoin remained within its fundamental behavior, whereas ETH saw several multi-standard deviation moves. This comes from a risk-off environment and a general capitulation of long-term ETH holders on the asset. For both algorithmic trading and ETH-backed lending, this creates a headache as the asset no longer behaves predictably, even by the high volatility expectations of digital asset markets. This chart shows 30-day vs. 30-day forward returns. It is a method for observing an asset's momentum. Dots in the lower left quadrant mean that the asset is moving in a negative direction. Assets that hover near the middle show mean reversion characteristics. Since the election in November of 2024, ETH has shown very little rebound and a lot of negative momentum. Meanwhile, bitcoin has largely reverted, meaning people are “buying the dip.” With ETH, they are not. Historically, these two assets have been highly correlated, but that is no longer the case. This makes sense as the assets are actually quite different and simply share the fact that they both operate on a blockchain. In this chart, we observe the amount of volatility over a 30-day period for BTC, ETH, and DOGE. High volatility can be profitable at times, but for institutional investors and traders, higher levels of volatility equate to lower position sizing. As the chart shows, ETH volatility has behaved more like DOGE than BTC since the start of the year. This makes institutional participation less attractive, suggesting declining trading volumes and market depth. Lastly, we can see that ETF buying of BTC has far outpaced that of ETH by almost 24 times. Even with a higher market cap, BTC total supply consumed by ETFs is more than double that of the ETH supply. The real demand here may even be overstated for ETH, as much of this buying is likely offset by short futures positions by traders engaging in the basis trade for delta-neutral yield. For digital assets to survive, they must find a meaningful bid from mainstream retail and institutional participants. The failure of ETH’s ETF creates a reflexive loop whereby institutions like BlackRock dedicate fewer resources to their promotion and sale. BTC has found the mainstream while ETH has floundered. Narratives do matter, though. Unlike BTC, ETH’s value prop is to be a Turing-complete decentralized computer. It aims to allow all types of decentralized applications to be built and operate on the platform. However, though ETH had a first-mover advantage and benefited from network effects of scale, many rising competitors have better fundamental technology and the ability to monetize. The most obvious example is Solana. Without getting too deep into the data, Solana and others offer faster transaction speeds, lower costs, and a better user experience than ETH. For some slow transactions, ETH works perfectly fine, but for others that require near-zero latency, like gaming or payments, ETH simply can’t compete. Further, the business model has essentially allowed ETH L2s to cannibalize almost all of the monetization of this infrastructure. How does something produce ongoing value if it can’t explain how it makes money? As a result, it has lost significant market share to Solana and others over the past few years, judged by the number of active developers, daily active users of products, and price appreciation.